Hi, here is the complete testing code.
01.<P>02.using System; 03.using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting; 04.using Telerik.JustMock; 05.using Telerik.JustMock.Core; 06. 07.namespace TestMock1 08.{ 09.[TestClass] 10.public class UnitTest1 11.{12.[TestMethod] 13.public void TestMethod1() 14.{ 15. var mock = Mock.Create<MyClass>(Behavior.CallOriginal); 16. Mock.Arrange(() => mock.MyFunc1(DateTime.Now)).DoNothing(); 17. mock.MyFunc2(); 18.} 19.} 20. 21.class SomeClass 22.{ 23. public DateTime SentDate { get; set; } 24.} 25. 26.public class MyClass 27.{ 28.SomeClass SomeObject; 29. 30.SomeClass GetObjectFromDB() 31.{ 32. SomeClass obj = new SomeClass(); 33. // get it from DB34. return obj; 35.} 36. 37.public virtual void MyFunc1(DateTime somedate) 38.{39. SomeObject = GetObjectFromDB(); 40.} 41.public virtual void MyFunc2() 42.{43. MyFunc1(SomeObject.SentDate); 44.} 45. 46.} 47.}</P>
At line 43 the code produces an exception because SomeObject is null
On a separate note, if I declare MyFunc2() as "internal" instead of "public", I can skip Behavior.CallOriginal and the original code is still called. I am not sure if this is a bug or feature.